SWI-Prolog 7
Jan Wielemaker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.prolog.swi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear SWI-Prolog user, The response to the recent changes was so overwhelming that I was glad to hear simple and positive responses not through the mailinglist. The discussions have improved the proposal as you can see in the 7.1.1 release. This process is probably not yet finished. I have seen enough support for these changes to pursue them. Due to the rather strong opinions on this list, quite a few people do not wish to get involved in the public debate. I will no longer answer to posts that want to erase the changes. I will answer to practical problems arising, as well as to requests to change details that will improve consistency, compatibility, usability, avoid blocking promising roads to further extensions, etc. The changes also caused several people to express their concern about where the project is heading. I think I've managed to convince some of you that this will make SWI-Prolog a more useful tool and that there is no risk that the system will become a new and incompatible language. Especially for those concerned about the future directions of the project, I compiled a document on this at http://www.swi-prolog.org/Directions.txt I am fully aware that the recent changes and now explicitly stated future directions may cause some people to turn their back on the project. I would like to thank them for the energy they've put in the project in the past. Regards --- Jan