Re: SWI-Prolog 7

On 4 December 2013 17:28, Ulrich Neumerkel <[email protected]>wrote:

> Jan Wielemaker:
> > Especially for those concerned about the future directions of the
> > project, I compiled a document on this at
> >
> >        http://www.swi-prolog.org/Directions.txt
>
> My answer is at
> http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/ulrich/iso-prolog/SWI7_and_ISO


I was just wondering if we'd be able to set aside the pedantic standards
bickering in the list for a while?  Like let's say, as a ballpark figure
only, you understand, about 99.44 years?  At about this point I'm actually
cheerleading for SWI to go out of its way to break every clause in the
Prolog standard just out of spite.  Thankfully Jan isn't as volatile as I
am.

Volatility aside, I don't see that this community has in any way benefited
from the geek arm-flapping and dick-waving.

-- 
"Perhaps people don't believe this, but throughout all of the discussions
of entering China our focus has really been what's best for the Chinese
people. It's not been about our revenue or profit or whatnot."
--Sergey Brin, demonstrating the emptiness of the "don't be evil" mantra.
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed