Re: dicts and feature structures

Michael Hendricks <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.ai.prolog.swi
Message-ID <CAFHuXubyvn5QG24i_vVswMKDaGDPjUZL0OZYXuTbOrRA2k7LEg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Samer,

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Abdallah, Samer <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I've just been looking at Michael Covington's GULP library for SWI
>         http://www.ai.uga.edu/mc/gulp/
> which compiles feature structures, of the sort found in unification
> based grammars, into ordinary Prolog terms, and enables you to
> write DCGs with named features instead of positional arguments
>

Thanks for the pointer.  I wasn't aware of Michael's GULP library.  It
looks quite useful.


> Now that we have the dict type, would it make any sense to allow
> a variant which unifies like a feature structure? Would there be
> any advantage to baking it into SWI in some way or is Covington's
> GULP library already good enough for those who want feature
> structures?
>

I'd like to see dicts behave as feature structures or LIFE psi-terms under
unification.  There was an extensive discussion on the mailing list about
unification semantics shortly after dicts were announced.  As I recall, Jan
was open to the possibility of something like your proposal but wants dicts
to simmer for a while before deciding for sure.

-- 
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.