Re: Pengine url

Yes, I agree it's not a clearcut case of making things clearer and
easier for developers.

- Torbjörn

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Jan Wielemaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/09/2014 01:09 PM, Torbjörn Lager wrote:
>> Yes, that's a nice addition. But maybe we should consider keeping the
>> event handlers separate, by grouping them like this?:
>>
>> var pengine = new Pengine({
>>     handlers: {
>>         oncreate: handleCreate,
>>         onsuccess: handleSuccess,
>>         onfailure: handleFailure,
>>         onstop, handleStop
>>         },
>>     server: 'http://mygame.org',
>>     src: ...
>> });
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I have no opinion.  I think quite a few JavaScript functions or classes
> use little structuring for the configuration object.  Anyone knows that
> onXXX is a handler, so if you nicely group them together in the list of
> properties, an extra object adds little IMHO.
>
>         Cheers --- Jan



-- 
Torbjörn Lager
Professor of General and Computational Linguistics
Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science
University of Gothenburg
Box 200, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
Phone: +46317864962