Re: where do I think wrong

Roelof Wobben <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.ai.prolog.swi
Message-ID <[email protected]>

> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:19:43 +0100
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [SWIPL] where do I think wrong
> 
> 
> Am 13.03.2014 09:04, schrieb Roelof Wobben:
> > It worked fine if a mother and father are known.
> > So I want to change it to this :
> > 
> > have_siblings(C) :-
> >     is_father(X,C),
> >     is_father(X,S); 
> >     is_mother(Y,S), 
> >     is_mother(Y,C), 
> >     C \= S,
> >     write(S).
> 
> I did not try your predicates, but there are (obviously?) parantheses
> missing. Better:
> 
> have_siblings(C) :-
>     ( ( is_father(X,C), is_father(X,S) )
>     ; ( is_mother(Y,S), is_mother(Y,C) ),
>     C \= S,
>     write(S).
> 

I changed it to what you said.

have_siblings(C) :-
    ( ( is_father(X,C), is_father(X,S) ) 
    ;( is_mother(Y,S), is_mother(Y,C) ), 
    C \= S,
    write(S).

but now I see a operand missing errror.

Roelof

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.