Re: Shrinkage value above 1 AMT

Interesting. Shrinkage values > 1 don't immediately make sense to me. They
imply that every time a linear regression model has been fitted to the
residuals remaining from the previous iteration, this model's predictions
are multiplied by a value > 1 before the residuals to be fitted by the
linear model(s) in the next iteration of "boosting" are computed.

Cheers,
Eibe

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:22 AM bujarra <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Does it make sense to set the shrinkage value above 1 in AMT (I even get
> better results with a value of 1.1-1.4?. Which is the unit of this
> parameter?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://weka.8497.n7.nabble.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Wekalist mailing list -- [email protected]
> Send posts to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, etc., visit
> https://list.waikato.ac.nz/postorius/lists/wekalist.list.waikato.ac.nz
> List etiquette:
> http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~ml/weka/mailinglist_etiquette.html
>

_______________________________________________
Wekalist mailing list -- [email protected]
Send posts to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, etc., visit https://list.waikato.ac.nz/postorius/lists/wekalist.list.waikato.ac.nz
List etiquette: http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~ml/weka/mailinglist_etiquette.html