Understanding the confusion matrix
Bob Matthews <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.weka |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi In an academic paper that I am trying to follow (with difficulty :)) they talk about a measure of accuracy being (TP + TN) / N TP = no. of correctly forecasted TRUE instances of the variable TN = no. of correctly forecasted FALSE instances of the variable N = total no. of instances But the confusion matrix I get using Auto-weka looks like:- a b <-- classified as 376 0 | a = TRUE 225 0 | b = FALSE i.e. the predictions are 'TRUE' for every instance This I don't understand ? The paper gets accuracy above 80% but the above yields 62.5% and if the predictions are always 'TRUE' who needs a model ? What am I missing here ? Bob M _______________________________________________ Wekalist mailing list -- [email protected] Send posts to [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, etc., visit https://list.waikato.ac.nz/postorius/lists/wekalist.list.waikato.ac.nz List etiquette: http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~ml/weka/mailinglist_etiquette.html