Re: [VOTE] release apr-util-1.6.2-rc2 as apr-util 1.6.2
Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/26/23 3:15 AM, Noel Butler wrote: > On 24/01/2023 22:08, Graham Leggett via dev wrote: > >> On 24 Jan 2023, at 02:02, Noel Butler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> This is a result of apr-util 1.6 STILL NOT patched for mariadb or mysql 10 plus >>> >>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61517#c5 >>> >> If you prepare a patch for 1.6 I can take a look. >> >> Is it possible to backport this to v1.6 given our rules? >> >> Regards, >> Graham >> > > > The patch referenced, works on 1.6.1, its the same patch IIRC being applied by RedHat, is applied by PV at Slackware, and probably > Debian too because modern (past few years of apru using *sql) wont build otherwise. I would be in favor of hearing further opinions on whether backporting this to APR-UTIL 1.6 complies with our versioning rules. If it does we should do so and release apr-util 1.6.2 with it. If not we should release APR-UTIL 1.6.2 now, but release APR-UTIL 1.7.0 shortly afterwards as soon as we have folded in the MySQL TLS stuff referred to in the other thread. Regards Rüdiger