Re: [VOTE] apr 1.7.2 and apr-util 1.6.3

Vote passes with 4 binding votes (thanks to all who voted/reviewed)

+1: covener, rpluem, jorton, ylavic

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 8:22 AM Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick votes everyone, I will just give it a couple more
> hours then proceed.
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:43 AM SteffenAL <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  +1 All fine on Windows
> >
> > Thanks! Eric
> >
> >
> > --- Original message ---
> > Subject: [VOTE] apr 1.7.2 and apr-util 1.6.3
> > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tuesday, 31/01/2023 22:23
> >
> > I hosed 1.7.1/1.6.2 and the archives have -rcX in them at the top
> > level. I would like to call for an expedited vote to replace them
> > with version bumps. I will proceed once we get 3 binding +1.
> >
> > I have re-tagged because I think the consensus will be that updating
> > the tarballs and signatures is too confusing.
> >
> > candidates are here:
> >
> > https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >
> > For the release of apr-1.7.2 AND apr-util-1.6.3
> >    [ ] +1 looks great
> >    [ ] -1 something is broken
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> [email protected]



-- 
Eric Covener
[email protected]