Re: CMake on Unix
Branko Čibej <[email protected]> Mon, 18 May 2026 00:42:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Apache Software Foundation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------sUsQw0hvOYSpvQxMwQ3KmrVd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 18. 5. 26 00:15, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On 18/05/2026 06:34, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 16. 5. 26 08:58, Noel Butler wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16/05/2026 10:09, Noel Butler wrote:
>>>
>>> i stopped reading at that, because its quite obvious you're out
>>> to make problems for anyone woh disagrees with you, save your
>>> breath, and after you apologise to the list for using offensive
>>> language, ensure you dont mail me directly again.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ohh, and I'm not surprised at the backup squad you brought in to
>>> push for cmake support, since I've received no less than three
>>> Emails today advising me of your association with Daniel Sahlberg
>>> and Nathan Hartman, you've all known each other for over 10 years.
>>>
>>> Says it all doesn't it :) ... and thats rhetorical, not a question.
>>>
>>
>> Careful with those ad hominems. I'm no stranger to having strong
>> opinions and using strong language on list, but you went way over the
>> line there.
>>
>>
>> -- Brane
>>
> *I was not the one who used the actual F word, *
>
Frankly, I don't care about any word used in this thread. If you want to
play sophistry games by replacing u with s, go right ahead. However,
*attacking Daniel and Nathan personally because of their association
with Timofei* is completely out of line. As is attacking him personally
because of his opinions about CMake don't align with yours.
> funny how nobody recognizes that and dares say boo about it to who
> actually did use it, yet are more than happy to nag on me for using a
> word I never used, with that borders on a threat, I can see clearly
> right through you.
>
> I can see whats going on here. 30 years of running abuse depts, RBL's,
> usenet servers and a 17year stint as an IRC oper on one of the most
> popular (and tough and rogue) networks around gives me thick skin, but
> also the ability to see right through people and their agendas.
>
Ah, I see, hidden agendas, conspiracies. And the old and well-worn
argumentum ad auctoritatem, which in some ways is worse than ad hominem.
If you can't hold a reasonably polite technical discussion without
immediately attacking people who disagree with you, you may have trouble
getting valid points across. I'll remind you that your very first post
in this thread started in a needlessly aggressive manner.
At this point the thing to do would be to take a deep breath, a step
back, and start again /without/ assuming everyone is out to get you.
-- Brane
--------------sUsQw0hvOYSpvQxMwQ3KmrVd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18. 5. 26 00:15, Noel Butler wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:[email protected]">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p id="reply-intro">On 18/05/2026 06:34, Branko Čibej wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div id="replybody1">
<div class="v1moz-cite-prefix">On 16. 5. 26 08:58, Noel Butler
wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<p id="v1reply-intro">On 16/05/2026 10:09, Noel Butler
wrote:</p>
<blockquote
style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0;">
<div id="v1replybody1"
style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif;">
<p>i stopped reading at that, because its quite obvious
you're out to make problems for anyone woh disagrees
with you, save your breath, and after you apologise to
the list for using offensive language, ensure you dont
mail me directly again.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div id="v1signature">
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Ohh, and I'm not surprised at the backup squad you
brought in to push for cmake support, since I've
received no less than three Emails today advising me of
your association with Daniel Sahlberg and Nathan
Hartman, you've all known each other for over 10 years.</p>
<p>Says it all doesn't it :) ... and thats rhetorical,
not a question.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Careful with those ad hominems. I'm no stranger to having
strong opinions and using strong language on list, but you
went way over the line there.<br>
<br>
<br>
-- Brane<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>I was not the one who used the actual F word, </strong></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Frankly, I don't care about any word used in this thread. If you
want to play sophistry games by replacing u with s, go right ahead.
However, <b>attacking Daniel and Nathan personally because of their
association with Timofei</b> is completely out of line. As is
attacking him personally because of his opinions about CMake don't
align with yours.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:[email protected]">
<p>funny how nobody recognizes that and dares say boo about it to
who actually did use it, yet are more than happy to nag on me
for using a word I never used, with that borders on a threat, I
can see clearly right through you.</p>
<p>I can see whats going on here. 30 years of running abuse depts,
RBL's, usenet servers and a 17year stint as an IRC oper on one
of the most popular (and tough and rogue) networks around gives
me thick skin, but also the ability to see right through people
and their agendas.</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ah, I see, hidden agendas, conspiracies. And the old and well-worn
argumentum ad auctoritatem, which in some ways is worse than ad
hominem.<br>
<br>
If you can't hold a reasonably polite technical discussion without
immediately attacking people who disagree with you, you may have
trouble getting valid points across. I'll remind you that your very
first post in this thread started in a needlessly aggressive manner.<br>
<br>
At this point the thing to do would be to take a deep breath, a step
back, and start again <i>without</i> assuming everyone is out to
get you.<br>
<br>
-- Brane<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------sUsQw0hvOYSpvQxMwQ3KmrVd--