Re: [STATUS] (apr-serf) Wed May 8 23:45:25 EDT 2002

Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:36:19PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> 
> 
> I think the URL utilities would go into apr-util. We have a "uri" section in
> there specifically for that stuff.
> 
> apr-serf would depend upon both apr and apr-util.
> 
> IMO, our next step for apr-serf is to start writing the serf.h header file.
> 
have we actually come to a consensus on how serf is to be structured?

should we come to a brief consensus on how we think this is going to 
work before writing the headers? (ie flesh out the roadmap a bit more)



> Cheers,
> -g
>