Short term release policy?
"Bert Huijben" <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:42:13 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.apr.serf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <03ad01d0e49a$7c740860$755c1920$__16056.2146259055$1443916078$gmane$org@qqmail.nl> |
Hi, I received a number of very good questions this morning: * Are we creating an [email protected] mailinglist to announce serf releases? * Do we want to create future 1.3.x serf releases? * If yes, do we want to change the license on 1.3.x? * What is the status of the 1.4.0 release? - [Subversion checks for >= 1.4 to enable logging] - The function pointer inequality problem is not solved by just dropping one function (remaining support), but not the other (config support). - Would the release process be easier if we just go 2.0 and introduce a proper versioning scheme? Given that the current 1.4.x problem may already break existing linkage scenarios... Bert