Re: Short term release policy?
Lieven Govaerts <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Sep 2015 21:04:12 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.apr.serf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANvU9sdtT_vMjMqoR0cuYFGpyT=5NToBqhbapCn1QBn-d9rV0g__41318.536483641$1443916083$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Bert Huijben <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I received a number of very good questions this morning: > * Are we creating an [email protected] mailinglist to announce serf > releases? > > * Do we want to create future 1.3.x serf releases? > * If yes, do we want to change the license on 1.3.x? Why would we? Can't we focus on 1.4.0 instead? Lieven > > * What is the status of the 1.4.0 release? > - [Subversion checks for >= 1.4 to enable logging] > - The function pointer inequality problem is not solved by just dropping one > function (remaining support), but not the other (config support). > > - Would the release process be easier if we just go 2.0 and introduce a > proper versioning scheme? > > Given that the current 1.4.x problem may already break existing linkage > scenarios... > > > Bert >