RE: Short term release policy?

"Bert Huijben" <[email protected]> Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:20:37 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.apr.serf.devel
Message-ID <057f01d0e571$65bc78a0$313569e0$__39451.7071814791$1443916094$gmane$org@qqmail.nl>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] =
On
> Behalf Of Justin Erenkrantz
> Sent: woensdag 2 september 2015 12:34
> To: Ivan Zhakov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bert Huijben <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Short term release policy?


> For Subversion, I thought that we didn't touch the license blocks for
> the pre-ASF releases though we did a couple of patch releases after
> the migration.  I know I wasn't the only one around at that time on
> this list (*grin*) - anyone remember the specifics?  I'd really prefer
> not to have a big delta on a patch release if at all possible.  --
> justin

I think we officially maintained Subversion 1.6 outside the ASF to avoid =
code churn, but I'm not entirely sure.

But for Subversion we had a strict relicense, while for serf the =
licensing was always Apache v2 with CLAs on file.

	Bert