RE: Short term release policy?
"Bert Huijben" <[email protected]> Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:20:37 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.apr.serf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <057f01d0e571$65bc78a0$313569e0$__39451.7071814791$1443916094$gmane$org@qqmail.nl> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] = On > Behalf Of Justin Erenkrantz > Sent: woensdag 2 september 2015 12:34 > To: Ivan Zhakov <[email protected]> > Cc: Bert Huijben <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Short term release policy? > For Subversion, I thought that we didn't touch the license blocks for > the pre-ASF releases though we did a couple of patch releases after > the migration. I know I wasn't the only one around at that time on > this list (*grin*) - anyone remember the specifics? I'd really prefer > not to have a big delta on a patch release if at all possible. -- > justin I think we officially maintained Subversion 1.6 outside the ASF to avoid = code churn, but I'm not entirely sure. But for Subversion we had a strict relicense, while for serf the = licensing was always Apache v2 with CLAs on file. Bert