RE: Short term release policy?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: dinsdag 8 september 2015 14:50
> To: Lieven Govaerts <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bert Huijben <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Short term release policy?
>=20
> On 1 September 2015 at 22:04, Lieven Govaerts <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Bert Huijben <[email protected]> =
wrote:
> >>         Hi,
> >>
> >> I received a number of very good questions this morning:
> >> * Are we creating an [email protected] mailinglist to =
announce
> serf
> >> releases?
> >>
> >> * Do we want to create future 1.3.x serf releases?
> >> * If yes, do we want to change the license on 1.3.x?
> >
> > Why would we? Can't we focus on 1.4.0 instead?
> One reason could be to complete ASF transition and make ASF release
> with minimal changes, then focus on 1.4.0 (or 1.5.0) release.
>=20
> My favorite option to release serf 1.4.0 by copying 1.3.x branch and
> merging license changes commits.

That by itself won't work for Subversion 1.9.

Subversion expects that it can enable logging for >=3D 1.4.0... So at =
the very least we should add a dummy handler for that.

But if we do that, then I would also like to see the support for a few =
new error codes to help diagnosing ssl problems.
...

Just releasing a 1.3.9 with the license change would work for me.

	Bert