Re: Moving serf to commons?

--On Monday, November 04, 2002 11:17:26 -0800 Greg Stein <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Hmm. Maybe we should use Subversion? We could certainly not worry about
> directory organization in that case. We'd lose CVS history, though, since
> we can't blend multiple CVS repositories over time. i.e. we could use
> cvs2svn for an initial set, but future additions would lose history since
> we couldn't "blend" them into an existing repos.

I would personally be a strong +1 for using Subversion for serf.  I think 
Subversion is ready for a trial run here within the ASF.

That said, I'm going to stay the heck out of this policy debate.  I want to 
see serf move to commons, but I'm not going to waste my breath arguing over 
it.  I've stated my position, and I'd rather spend my time improving the 
code.  -- justin