Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC2
"Philip M. Gollucci" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.apreq,gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Organization | P6M7G8 Consulting |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Edward J. Sabol wrote: >>>> I think we're ready from some +/-1s :) >>> Although it doesn't affect me since I don't develop on Mac OS X, I'd >>> still like to see you include the simple CFLAGS fix for "make test" >>> for Mac OS X, for what it's worth. >> Can you be more specific as to what you are talking about ? > > Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> mentioned it on the mailing list three days > ago. Here's a URL to refresh your memory, as well as two URLs to the original > thread from March in which the fix was noted: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-apreq-dev/200605.mbox/%[email protected]%3e > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-apreq-dev/200603.mbox/%[email protected]%3e > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-apreq-dev/200603.mbox/%[email protected]%3e Thanks, >Hi there, > >Thanks for the excellent tools, I don't know what I'd do without >Apache2::Request. > >I'm packaging libapreq2 for the Fink distribution (http:// >fink.sf.net), and I ran into a small bug. It appears that the library >test 'util' fails (test 36 and 37). This appears to be a result of >bad (?) optimization by GCC, compiling util.c with -O0 works fine. >Could you please modify the CFLAGS for that target accordingly? you mean to tell me GCC on mac os x optimizes the ? operator incorrectly, but only in library/util.c BOO! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci ([email protected]) 323.219.4708 Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com 1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F "It takes a minute to have a crush on someone, an hour to like someone, and a day to love someone, but it takes a lifetime to forget someone..."