Re: Make test failed

Boysenberry Payne <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.apreq
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm in the progress of updating it all (except gcc version 3.2.3, is  
that bad?)

On my dev box I've been using Apache/2.0.55, should I upgrade to 2.2 or  
is that
too new?  It seems that the 2.0 is as 58 should I update both my  
development
and my production to that?  I know you know best.

> How did you get past the version check of this ?

Until last night my production server was managed by my host.
So I'm not sure how they installed anything.  While I was installing
libapreq cpan failed so I tried it at the command line, and still
got the errors, so I'm not sure I could get passed the version check.

As I was updating my perl modules via cpan I noticed a lot of
test failures.  Not that I've installed perl v5.8.8 they're gone.

Thanks for the help,
Boysenberry

boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com

On Jul 8, 2006, at 3:35 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:

> Boysenberry Payne wrote:
>> I'm trying to build libapreq2-2.07 on Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-42,
>> Apache/2.0.46, perl v5.8.0 built for i386-linux-thread-multi,
> 2.0.48 is a minium version. Please read the CHANGES file. I strongly  
> suggest upgrading
> _ALL_ that software its ancient.
>
> How did you get past the version check of this ?
>
> Also, if you are using gcc 4.x you'll need to add -fno-strict-aliases
> which will be in 2.08 and I'm rolling 2.08-RC3 right this second.
>
> --  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> -
> Philip M. Gollucci ([email protected]) 323.219.4708
> Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
> Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
> 1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F  6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F
>
> "In all that I've done wrong I know I must have done something right to
> deserve a hug every morning and butterfly kisses at night."
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.