Re: Should we release 2.10?
"Philip M. Gollucci" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.apreq |
|---|---|
| Organization | P6 Web Applications |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 10:44 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: >> Is there anything that needs to be addressed still before we roll this? >> It's been a long time since the last stable release, I think we should >> go ahead and get something out the door... > > Just another ping on this. > > There was talk of merging new features before the release and of people > accessing apreq via Perl seeing segfaults. Anyone has an opinion on > this? > > PS. These are not things that I use. > did you see the [email protected] post ? I'd like to pick this up again. _STRONG_ +1 to release 1.34 and 2.10 If you want to volunteer RM for one of them, I'll take the other. I've got some time between now and thanks giving. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci ([email protected]) c: 703.336.9354 Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc. http://p6m7g8.net Senior System Admin - RideCharge, Inc. http://ridecharge.com 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.