Re: Should we release 2.10?

"Philip M. Gollucci" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.apreq
Organization P6 Web Applications
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 22:56 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>  
>> [are all my solaris fixes on the 2_10 branch ?]
> 
> Not sure. What should I be looking for?
I'm compiling things now, I'll take a look in few.

Is that with
$ make test TEST_VERBOSE=1

> 
> BTW, I'm getting test failures:
> ---------------------------------
> t/request........NOK 34/36# Failed test 34 in t/request.t at line 93
> fail #2 
> # Failed test 36 in t/request.t at line 118 fail #2
> t/request........FAILED tests 34,
> 36                                         
> 	Failed 2/36 tests, 94.44% okay
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci ([email protected]) c: 703.336.9354
Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc.  http://p6m7g8.net
Senior System Admin - RideCharge, Inc.  http://ridecharge.com
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.