Re: Should we release 2.10?

Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Adam Prime wrote:
>> Bojan Smojver wrote:
>>>> http://httpd.apache.org/apreq/docs/libapreq2/group__apreq__xs__request.html 
>>>>
>> Does the attached patch work?
> Committed revision 721096.
> Backported to branches/2_10 721099.
> 
> 
> you forgot to bump the =over value :)
> 

My understanding of =over <num>, which seems to be confirmed by perldoc 
perlpod was that <num> is the indent level, so i'm not sure why you 
would want to bump it.

Maybe i'm misunderstanding what you meant though.

Adam