Re: Questions about apreq_params

Michael Koziarski wrote:
>> It should definitely not be deprecated.  Its kind of 'core' to the module.
> 
> But unless I'm mistaken, it'll just silently fail in these situations
> with malformed bodies?  What would be the suggested action in that
> situation?  something like this?
I think step one is to come up with a test that reproduces the break in 
the docs.  Commit it as 'skip', then fix the code so the test passes 
ensuring we don't break anything else in the process.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci ([email protected]) c: 703.336.9354
Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc.  http://p6m7g8.net
Senior System Admin - RideCharge, Inc.  http://ridecharge.com
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.