Re: svn commit: r733221 - in /httpd/apreq/branches/v2_10: include/apreq_version.h library/module_cgi.c library/parser.c module/apache2/handle.c

On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 06:32 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Are you planning to pursue 2.10 as RM or
> should we be moving on to 2.11?  The only outstanding issue I am aware
> of is pgollucci's claim that the perl modules aren't linking correctly
> to libapreq2 on Solaris.  While that would be nice to fix, I don't consider
> it a showstopper either.

I'm kinda waiting for the outcome of that discussion on the list before
we go ahead. From what I can see, current decision is to have 2.11
released, right? If so, let's roll that (I'm not attached to version
numbers in any way).

-- 
Bojan