Re: Java package names
Gregg Wonderly <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.incubator.river.devel,gmane.comp.apache.commons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From a name and branding perspective, removing the use of com.sun, could help people focus on "River" as opposed to "Sun's Jini Implementation". I have several references to com.sun.jini.start. But, I also have my own fork of 2.1 that I'm still using in active deployments. River should be "River". Gregg Wonderly On 10/12/2010 12:21 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > What Benson is talking about is not com.sun packages in the JDK, but > that Jini implementation classes resides in com.sun packages (compared > to spec classes residing in net.jini space) > > They should go as part of a suitable level bump in versioning. The > impact on users is reasonably small... > > Niclas > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Matthias Wessendorf<[email protected]> wrote: >> if you care to be able to run on a different JVM, than it needs to be fixed. >> >> Generally it's bad to rely on some "private" packages/APIs >> >> -M >> >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Benson Margulies<[email protected]> wrote: >>> River imported packages of code from the original Sun grant under the >>> name 'com.sun.whatever'. >>> >>> How important is it to change that? >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > >