Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

>
> Well, your opinion is diametrically opposed to Lucene.NET's project
> goals...
>
>
Perhaps but are those goals still valid?

Unless I've missed something the project is in danger of shutting down;
maybe a re-imagining of the project is required?

Ciaran


On 1 November 2010 14:07, Robert Jordan <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 01.11.2010 12:38, Ciaran Roarty wrote:
>
>> A simple port could be achieved using IKVM, could it not? (
>> http://www.ikvm.net/ )
>>
>
> Feel free to try it out if you're fine with adding yet another
> layer to your .NET apps.
>
> For each binary translator + runtime out there, I'd rather run a
> native port.
>
>
> If so, what's the point of Lucene.NET?
>>
>
> See the first paragraph of http://lucene.apache.org/lucene.net/
>
>
> I don't feel I am missing the point, I feel I am expressing an opinion.
>>
>
> Well, your opinion is diametrically opposed to Lucene.NET's project
> goals...
>
> Robert
>
>