Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

Florian Effenberger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss,gmane.comp.apache.commons.general
Organization The Document Foundation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-06-06 02.28:
> Because Oracle and TDF, in confidential negotiations, could not come to
> an agreement.  And I think that's all that need be said on the matter.

well, I guess it has been mentioned on this list before, but let me 
state it this way:

What TDF would have appreciated since its announcement, even what the 
wider community would have appreciated to have been given by Oracle even 
before TDF was announced, is *very* similar to what Apache seems to have 
been granted.

I cannot see any real difference to the community demands the last 
years, and I wonder why things seemed to be impossible for the community 
and TDF, and seem to be possible for ASF.

I do not blame ASF for anything, but, similar to what I read yesterday 
about your picture of our legal status, I call everyone to be cautious 
with "rumors". Because they are simply that: Rumors.

Seems like a lot of fuzz is flowing around, at the expense of the truth. 
Sticking to the facts instead of listening to story-tellers is sometimes 
helpful.

Florian

-- 
Florian Effenberger <[email protected]>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.