Re: Log4J 2
Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.log4j.devel,gmane.comp.apache.commons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+1 for bringing log4j-2.0 to the surface of the earth :) LieGrue, strub >________________________________ > From: Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >To: Logging General <[email protected]> >Cc: Log4J Developers List <[email protected]> >Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 5:56 PM >Subject: Re: Log4J 2 > > > > >On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >On 2012-02-06, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> >>As you may be aware I have been working on Log4j 2 for about 2 years >>> >>now. It now consists of a fairly large body of code with fairly >>> >>decent documentation. I feel it is ready to come out of my >>> >>experimental branch and onto its own main branch where others will >>> >>hopefully feel more inclined to participate. >>> >>For the benefit of the log4(X != j) communities, can you give some sort >>of elevator pitch for log4j 2.0? What is different? Given that the >>other projects around here have followed the 1.x model, it will be good >>to know what you considered good or bad of the "old" approach. >> >>Don't hesitate to send me to some sort of overview document, I admit I >>haven't looked for one, yet. >> > >You can find the latest documentation at http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/log4j2/ > > >Ralph > >