Re: Moving log4cxx to the Attic

Hi.

We are also using log4cxx in one of our products and we are currently migrating this product from a 32-bit to a 64-bit platform.
I am very excited to see what impact that will have on log4cxx.
If our tests fail we can always try to run those applications in 32-bit mode.
We are using version 0.10.0.

So basically, we still need log4cxx and would like to see more activity around the development, but i understand fully that for that you must have
people that have time and interest. And as I myself do not have time I cannot make other people prioritise it either.

So.. Just a message to say that it's in use here too..

Best Regards,

Tomas Andersen
Senior Consultant
+47 91 87 32 77

[cid:D8FEA1FF-E055-413B-A9C7-80D4D1EF4659]
Tønne Huitfeldts Plass 2  |  N-1767 Halden  |  NORWAY
www.morecom.no <www.morecom.no>

Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described at www.morecom.no/mail-disclaimer.html <http://www.morecom.no/mail-disclaimer.html>





From: chand priyankara <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: Log4CXX Dev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, February 7, 2013 10:19 AM
To: Log4CXX Dev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Logging General <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: Moving log4cxx to the Attic

We are using this library, a lot.
This is kind of a well stable product, and seems small amount of changes,enhancements.
So it seems inactive, but NOT.

Some custom appenders been developed, but not in code base.
i feel, we cant consider this as dead. :(

regards,


        Chand Priyankara  [Facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/chand.priyankara>  [LinkedIn] <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/chandpriyankara>  [Blogger] <http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com/>  [Google Plus] <http://plus.google.com/104246340732624023499>
|BSc(Eng) - Electrical & Information
|(094) 773-361-566
|[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
|http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com<http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com/>
[http://images.wisestamp.com/apps/causes/wwf_banner.png]<http://www.iucnredlist.org/amazing-species>sent via internet


On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Alexandru Zbârcea <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We use log4xx extensively ...

There are few changes I wanted to push, but I had no time ...

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Andrew Lazarus <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It's doing everything I want! So I haven't had any need to develop further.

On Feb 06, 2013, at 09:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hello

I would like to propose we move the log4cxx component to the attic.
I am not sure if the Apache Attic itself is the right place:
http://attic.apache.org/

as it seems to feed on TLDs only. I will ask there, if we agree that
log4cxx is not really maintained and that there will no work happen in
future.

I have hoped that there were a couple of people coming back to the
project when they see somebody is committing their patches. But it
hasn't happened and my own C skills are not enough to push this (time
is an issue too).

In case we agree, I would like to to keep the old log4cxx website,
saying this project is not longer maintained and the source code has
been moved to attic (if the attic.apache.org<http://attic.apache.org> would take it). Other
options are also welcome, just let me hear what you think.

Best regards,
Christian

--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de