[VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32
Ross Gardler <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:43:13 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.community.devel,gmane.comp.apache.commons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BY2PR03MB49095449BF33367E7F3953699640@BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> |
A vote is underway on the Ripple Dev list for release 0.9.32.
The Ripple dev thread can be found at http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ripple-dev/201508.mbox/browser
The text of the initial vote email is copied below for your convenience.
At this point we have 2 IPMC votes and 3 PPMC votes, I request IPMC members to look over the VOTE for us:
--- pasted initial VOTE text from http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ripple-dev/201508.mbox/browser
---
[Since 0.9.31 was a bust because of a regression, here is another release that includes a fix
for that regression (and a couple of other minor fixes)]
Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.32.
The package you are voting on is available for review at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/.
The SHA-1 hash for the package is:
63a997594e4f08df8d48a644962b47bee4efd91e
It was published from its corresponding git tag:
incubator-ripple: 0.9.32 (f8c6a0bc99)
While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator project like Ripple
means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors and committers/PPMC members are still
encouraged to review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance
with the checklist at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
(however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be confident the release
meets requirements.
Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish
it to NPM.
I vote +1:
* Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
* Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers, nor new third
party dependencies that needed to have license information included in the LICENSE file.
* Verified the build works and all tests pass.
* Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
Thanks!
Tim