Re: "Forking is a Feature" reactions?
Sam Ruby <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.community |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Isabel Drost <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 Jeff Hammerbacher <hammer-psgPW5cihnJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd love to hear the reactions of other ASF members to the piece. I'd >> also love to be directed to previous discussions on the topic, as I >> know that adopting git for some projects has been discussed >> previously. > > IIRC there should be some discussions on the archive of the infra and > community mailing lists that were caused back when the read-only git > mirrors were set-up. > > However I agree it would be nice to have one page that summarises the > results of these discussions - especially the problems that various > people saw. That way re-checking from time to time whether these > might be resolvable by additional tooling or a use of git different > from how it was discussed on the lists becomes easier. I just can't resist the opportunity to fork this discussion: http://intertwingly.net/blog/2010/09/13/One-True-Way - Sam Ruby