Re: "Forking is a Feature" reactions?

Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.community
Message-ID <[email protected]>
----- Original Message ----

> From: Torsten Curdt <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 11:10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: "Forking is a Feature" reactions?
> 
> >>  Everyone else gets a "working
> >> copy" and is  expected to  create a patch (or patches) and then work to
> >> convince a committer   to apply them.
> >
> > That's not the Apache model, fwiw.   Collaboration means you work as equals,
> > committer status or  not.
> 
> Hm? Reality check?
> 
> Usually patches only get applied if  committers think they are good
> enough and worthy to apply. Not every patch  gets applied no matter
> what.

And how is that dependent on the version control tool?  See, it isn't.
It's a function of the community's value system.

> >> A distributed version control  system is a measure toward  eliminating
> >> that have/have not  distinction; it reduces the barrier to  contribution.
> >
> > No it  doesn't.
> 
> I could create the longest thread on this list by saying "Yes,  it does!"
> ...but maybe let's say - that's what people call a difference in  opinion  ;)

That shouldn't prevent more knowledgable people from correcting you tho.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.