Re: "Forking is a Feature" reactions?

Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.community
Message-ID <[email protected]>
----- Original Message ----

> From: Eric Evans <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 1:02:17 PM
> Subject: Re: "Forking is a Feature" reactions?
> 
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:05 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > It is  amazing  how you (and I mean a big y'all of people negating
> > >  distributed SCM along  those last 5 years or so) can keep the
> > >  illusion that a technical solution  (called "centralization" here) 
> >  > can keep an organization together more than a  set of core values 
> > > can.
> > 
> > It comes from experience with dealing with  younger projects in the
> > Incubator that are not so enthralled with svn's  workflows, and the
> > social problems that seem to result from those  attitudes.  Eric is
> > a relatively new committer at Apache and he  still talks about his
> > role as being like a "gatekeeper".  That's  not something he picked
> > up from us. 
> 
> I'm going to work really  hard at not being offended by this.
> 
> I do not view myself as a gatekeeper,  and more importantly, that is not
> a role I desire (for myself or anyone  else).  However, I'm not
> self-deluded enough to believe that because I  aspire to lofty ideals,
> that I somehow do not possess access to a controlled  resource _that
> others do not_.

Then perhaps your portrayal of the typical role for an Apache committer
was "exaggerated for effect".  When the day comes that most of our
patch submissions to jira are git-formatted (and hence incompatible with
svn) I will be far more receptive to the idea that svn is a greater barrier
to community participation than svn is.

> If anything, my interest in a  decentralized version control system is to
> even the playing field, remove  obstacles, and empower contributors.

Sure, but you have to ask yourself why it is that Apache committers tend
to make a *lot* more noise about this than our contributors do.  I suspect
the motivation is more "because git is so powerful" than the more idealistic
notion that "git levels the playing field".  But I commend your idealism
nonetheless.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.