Re: Low level community

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ...With a large number of TLPs, some are going to be in this state.  Not
>> attic-worthy, still useful, minimal active development...
>
> Agreed - and from the board's point of view it's good for such
> projects to mention in their reports that although their activity is
> minimal, they do have at least 3 active PMC members who can step in
> when needed. If that's the case, low activity and small communities
> are fine.

+1

I've added a note to this affect to the "Describe the overall activity
in the project over the past quarter." bullet in

http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting

> -Bertrand

- Sam Ruby