Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.65-rc3 as httpd-2.4.65

Daniel Gruno <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/21/25 22:55, Nick Edwards wrote:
> All good on gentoo
> 
> Also, can I ask why, and this is a long time problem, the sigs dont make 
> it to wherever rsync lives?
> Any chance this can get fixed?
> I have over time emailed infra twice ( probably 6 months apart) but get 
> no response, probably because i'm not with ASF so they junk it.
> Sure this is not the development but "release" where I think more 
> important :)   Yes, the sigs are as Rainer points out, in the dev.

The checksum/signature files have historically been omitted from the 
mirror system, and will continue to be omitted in the foreseeable future.

This is to force users to only verify against signatures and checksums 
from trusted apache.org sources where we can vouch for the authenticity 
of those files, especially the less secure checksum files.

Work is underway on a brand new distribution system that will better 
address modern requirements like CRA/CISA policies, but in the meantime, 
users will still need to verify against signatures and checksums from 
trusted sources.

> 
> rsync -v rsync.apache.org::apache-dist/httpd/
> receiving file list ... done
> drwxrwxr-x          4,096 2025/07/11 11:21:36 .
> -rw-rw-r--          3,994 2014/09/03 05:17:36 .htaccess
> -rw-rw-r--          3,880 2025/07/10 21:37:55 Announcement2.4.html
> -rw-rw-r--          2,515 2025/07/10 21:37:55 Announcement2.4.txt
> -rw-rw-r--        383,176 2025/07/11 11:21:28 CHANGES_2.4
> -rw-rw-r--          9,015 2025/07/11 11:21:28 CHANGES_2.4.64
> -rw-rw-r--              0 2025/07/10 21:57:02 CURRENT-IS-2.4.64
> -rw-rw-r--            458 2024/07/18 04:03:46 HEADER.html
> -rw-rw-r--          2,073 2024/07/18 03:55:16 README.html
> -rw-rw-r--      7,293,281 2025/07/10 21:37:55 httpd-2.4.64.tar.bz2
> -rw-rw-r--      9,590,595 2025/07/10 21:37:55 httpd-2.4.64.tar.gz
> -rw-rw-r--         19,006 2016/12/22 06:14:45 httpd_logo_wide_new.png
> drwxrwxr-x          4,096 2022/06/17 21:25:12 binaries
> drwxrwxr-x          4,096 2022/06/17 21:25:19 docs
> drwxrwxr-x          4,096 2022/08/25 23:10:44 libapreq
> drwxrwxr-x          4,096 2022/06/17 21:25:19 mod_fcgid
> drwxrwxr-x          4,096 2022/06/17 21:25:19 mod_ftp
> drwxrwxr-x          4,096 2023/04/11 09:12:00 patches
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 10:31 PM Eric Covener <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi all,
> 
>     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> 
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ <https://
>     dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/>
> 
>     I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>     this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.65-rc3 as 2.4.65:
>     [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>     [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>     [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
> 
>     The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>     sha256: 4f92861a50325c6d1046ebad5d814bff0d4169ada8cc265655f32b7f1ba4be1b
>     *httpd-2.4.65-rc3.tar.gz
>     sha512:
>     b5824f85481e8617c35bd9da9ee5d933d6d744646e84ebf0471f87e4075f48c6f6f2b38f8234ad63ecc2816cad389c356cad574bc44d4fa7999ecf7579e24c1e
>     *httpd-2.4.65-rc3.tar.gz
> 
>     The candidate source is found at
>     <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.65-rc3-
>     candidate <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.65-
>     rc3-candidate>>
>     and at <https://github.com/apache/httpd/tree/2.4.65-rc3-candidate
>     <https://github.com/apache/httpd/tree/2.4.65-rc3-candidate>>.
> 
>     -- 
>     Eric Covener
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.