RE: Re: GHA enablement for s390x and ppc64le
"Shreya Sawant via dev" <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Dec 2025 05:56:39 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CO1PR15MB50179934BDD618B2E53B8695F7B5A@CO1PR15MB5017.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> |
Hi Eric, Thank you for your prompt reply. There is an Infra issue opened to add GHA Runner for s390x architecture in Kafka: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26431. There also exists a similar issue for Power: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26198. This might be a useful pointer to get conversation started. Thanks. Shreya On 2025/12/10 14:18:53 Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 9:08 AM Shreya Sawant via dev > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello Team, > > > > We are interested in adding s390x and ppc64le support to Apache HTTP Server GitHub Actions. Previously s390x was part of Apache HTTP Server Travis CI, but was dropped when CI was moved to GitHub Actions as it did not have native support for s390x. We now have hosted GHA actions runners available for IBM Z and ppc64le and gradually onboarding open source communities to utilize it as we work on expanding the capacity. > > > > I'll be happy to engage with Apache HTTP Server community to see if this solution helps with the enablement. An onboarding document(https://github.com/IBM/actionspz/blob/main/docs/FAQ.md) is available. If community agrees, we are glad to provide necessary support. > > > > Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks! > > Hi Shreya, thanks for the offer. Do you know if any other ASF repos > have navigated this process? I imagine we'd need our centralized infra > team to approve and install the GH App, which means they'd also need > an IBMID. If we could point to another project, it might expedite > things. >