Re: Attribution of AI assisted code generation

On 4/22/26 5:10 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 7:36 AM Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe we should follow something like the Attribution section of https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-assistants.html
>> for our own commits as well.
>> I saw Joe already doing something like this in his commits, but we probably should agree on a standard template / line
>> for us here.
> 
> Our assistant at IBM doesn't disclose the model/models used for a
> given task, so I would like for it to be flexible or optional.

I think this is fine as well. I think the core thing is that we mention if an AI contributed to the patch at least if
it goes beyond what wizards or any other assistants in developer suits were able to do before AI.
If we can provide the details on the model I think this is valuable if not, then we don't.

Regards

Rüdiger