Re: Test suite - commit process clarifications
Eric Covener <[email protected]> Tue, 19 May 2026 13:08:21 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALK=YjM1cdrpp=f1TBot-6egD0J3aYx==7GNak5nDvEswk8cEQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 12:37=E2=80=AFPM Joe Orton <[email protected]> wrot= e: > > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 12:09:16PM +0200, Giannis Christodoulou wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I was reading through the project guidelines [1] and the 2.4.x STATUS f= ile > > [2] and had a couple of questions about the process for test suite chan= ges. > > > > The guidelines say that changes to the active repository (trunk) are su= bject > > to lazy consensus, while changes to a prior branch (2.4.x) require cons= ensus > > before commit. > > They also distinguish between ideas (RTC) and patches (CTR). In additio= n, > > the 2.4.x STATUS file has a list of RTC exceptions and tests are not > > mentioned there. > > > > So my questions are: > > > > 1. Does adding or fixing/updating a test count as a patch, hence a > > committer can push it to trunk under lazy consensus? > > Yes, definitely. > > > 2. Should test-only changes to 2.4.x remain under full RTC? I know that > > a bad test can mask real issues but since they don't affect runtime > > behavior I think it could have a lighter process. > > This is fine and is covered by "CI configuration and scripts" in my > view. +1 but we should make it explicit (and there is no RTC in httpd-tests)