Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.68-rc1 as httpd-2.4.68

Jeff McKenna <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Jun 2026 16:02:18 -0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
+1 on:
     - Windows (MSVC 2022 & CMake 4.3.3)
     - no workarounds needed!


thanks,

-jeff





On 2026-06-05 12:23 p.m., Frank Gingras wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 11:21 AM Jim Jagielski <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     +1 on:
>        - macOS 26.5.1/arm64/Xcode 26.4
>        - Ubuntu 24LTS x86-64
> 
>     Thx for RMing!
> 
>>     On Jun 5, 2026, at 8:58 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ <https://
>>     dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/>
>>
>>     I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>>     this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.68-rc1 as 2.4.68:
>>     [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>>     [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>>     [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>
>>     The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>>     sha256:
>>     ed9a9d4500fb48bb28eaffb3ba71d06ccf86d498fa13ab9f781da010cc488498
>>     *httpd-2.4.68-rc1.tar.gz
>>     sha512:
>>     de3d6e2dd37a600b99b63b6740a06348d6f7642109f3c35e7eb1b82088ade8a5da9145b52c232587b9c2604c33ae908d0009ada4ea3168679e7f061b3135112d
>>     *httpd-2.4.68-rc1.tar.gz
>>
>>     The candidate source is found at
>>     <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.68-rc1-
>>     candidate <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/
>>     tags/2.4.68-rc1-candidate>>
>>     and at <https://github.com/apache/httpd/tree/2.4.68-rc1-candidate
>>     <https://github.com/apache/httpd/tree/2.4.68-rc1-candidate>>.
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Eric Covener
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>     --
>     Jim
>        "This is an outrage!"
>                              Tony Harrison
> 
> 
> Just tested on Slackware64, no issues here.
> 
> +1