Re: Working towards HTTP3 - current MPM's only support TCP connections
"Helmut K. C. Tessarek" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-18 02:06, Tarek wrote: > I propose retargeting PR #699 to the 2.4.x series as an enabling step, while > developing the broader design on 2.5.x. I would not touch 2.5.x at all. There is no 2.6 in sight and I believe Stefan explained the hassle and all that comes with that trunk dev concept pretty well. Nobody will run 2.5.x in production and nobody has time to backport h3 stuff to 2.4. I suggest to develop h3 on the 2.4 branch (which means people can actually run it in prod) and should 2.6 ever see the light of day in 15 or so years, h3 has probably been superseeded by h4 or h5. Cheers, K. C.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEE191csiqpm8f5Ln9WvgmFNJ1E3QAFAmqMZY4FAwAAAAAACgkQvgmFNJ1E3QBa 9Q//TqP+OF0v6jOV7e22UzeLmjs7vnIKLoMu9iiSbWaqjf6w7Pw0Bgn2UQ5IKK6YyQfg84nbW5na xBQnv1TZwIbBMILc/QXbLDqOcXv2RC/6Oxg7EQ/F6BjOWqcNiLRqQxgj0GHkdRf2chV7mHcZ9ZY/ /puK62TM9Pl+w7vQeAAV1axUnWCOheqcfHScClo2na3NkPxyRZc7OOhpHS8427bHdCAE9Xd8BQzu AbOaEZQQFIqYo8xLUMPFZbyL1liq8pnsU/S8HcWJQVRAGllrkFV1wF3hRJK9f2oZMUpTeu+ohixF iDUHMVy7HN3Xc+taBMS3HRBvBkZn3IWmdkkJFE7vbnTzIRldszeAl2b8fN+amLCmSyI/WhNTNHYi gNel1SYHt/c8Hzfvb1M5NMXOIF150xGBP4ZeJSAUH54RY2sfcluHVuVkgG7gsDtCuVGQkByVag+L 3epxWvd0CGuSBnj8QbFhr4D3i3o1f3geBvsLIeuX5MQgt6ISfGLYcW4mT/ud6DBNQwU/vC4ssTNL kqK0CLNi9OGx3casNwUCYyCEPK6A6VDSB4kPW6aZoow27N1s6dFdKO/uXYFFIMl37eBriOkuddin I5Z9Au/lCLZx+N0xZ26KvpZV6iZNRMbDuNFcE+I2ISIFX8snITrDnLI91TGzk9vIQ0zY3g+OUm7d NVk= =rdLg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----