[Bug 70025] AccessFileName Directive: Outdated regarding AllowOverride

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70025

--- Comment #8 from Philippe Cloutier <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #7)

Thank you for the explanation/confirmation

> The danger of changing that file name to something else is that
> troubleshooting a server becomes a guessing game of where the configuration
> might be hiding. That's why we have consistently encouraged people (on irc
> and on the users mailing list) not to do this. So suggesting in the doc that
> someone do this seems unkind.

Obviously, every change to default configuration makes behavior harder to
understand, but I did not read the example as a *suggestion*. I read it as an
illustration of how it behaves. FWIW, I would have found an example using
several (2) names more interesting, as that is the most complicated case to
understand.

If that directive is considered "dangerous", I would prefer a section with 1
example and 1 warning against overriding to a section without any of these.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.