Re: Patches for pt-br translation
Lucien Gentis <[email protected]> Sat, 9 May 2026 13:29:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 07/05/2026 à 21:05, Rich Bowen a écrit : > What do folks think? I’m not in a position review any of this, being illiterate in this language. Do we want to enforce our traditional “must have a second fluent reader” requirement, or do we want to get these out there in the name of having more translations, and wait for reports from users if there’s a problem? > > —Rich > Imagine there’s no more translators Only AI and reviewers Imagine all these entities Working hand in hand Oooh Ooooh, Ooh Ooh Ooh You may say I’m a dreamer, but ... ************************************* It is not utopia thinking of automatic translation (and updates) via AI of the doc in several languages, while translators were here to review the job. All in all, that’s the purpose of AI : doing basic job while people can focus on details ?