Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hamilton - apache-hamilton-contrib 0.0.9-incubating (RC1)
Alin Jerpelea <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:09:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+9ODHErnMEwqDSszUU91JqUK-HPjQBCPc0FKrsgh8J+h0Ge8g@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000b315ea065678c4de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 (binding) checked that exist -LICENSE -DISCLAIMER -NOTICE Best regards Alin J On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 3:27=E2=80=AFPM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wro= te: > To be explicit about my vote =E2=80=94 my earlier reply only responded to= the > naming concern: > > +1 (binding) to release apache-hamilton-contrib 0.0.9-incubating RC1. > > I verified it in full (scripts/verify-sub-packages/verify_contrib.sh > 0.0.9): GPG signature good (key > FE668E857E89A11C5E5C000CA8D3D15600545C61), SHA512 match, Apache RAT > clean, builds from source (flit), hamilton.contrib namespace imports > OK, LICENSE / NOTICE / DISCLAIMER present, "incubating" in the > artifact names. > > On PJ's point (#1652): I agree the per-user /user/<name>/ contrib > layout isn't ideal for an ASF project and should move to feature-based > naming. But, like PJ, I don't treat it as a blocker for this release =E2= =80=94 > it's a rename that can land in a follow-up, and the vote is on the > artifacts' provenance and licensing, which check out. So my +1 stands, > with a request that the naming be addressed in a subsequent release. > > Thanks, > Jarek > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --000000000000b315ea065678c4de--