Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator

tison <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general
Message-ID <CALL9TYKh3xAdHXDdB-x_6NdS2r=P5T=6a7AP0vcC1yMjP1wmCw@mail.gmail.com>
A minor comment, you miss to count Orthur Black <[email protected]>'s +1
non-binding.


Best,
tison.


Twice <[email protected]> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:46写道:

> This vote has now passed with 5 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 non-binding
> votes.
>
> +1 binding:
> Xuanwo
> tison
> hulk
> Alin Jerpelea
> Twice
>
> +1 non-binding:
> mingcheng
> Lok Andy
>
> Best,
> Twice
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:42 PM Twice <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Ahh also with my own +1. 😝
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:34 PM Twice <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you all! I'll announce the result soon.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Twice
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 2:15 PM Alin Jerpelea <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Alin J
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, 03:54 hulk, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 binding
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 00:31, Orthur Black <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:45 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, at 22:41, tison wrote:
> > > > > > > > My +1 binding
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
> name", which
> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
> done. Given
> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
> pinning
> > > > > it,
> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
> publishing
> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
> else... and
> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The rebrand has been done at [1]. The proposed PPMC would
> reach out
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > downstream projects and help them to migrate to the new
> asyncband
> > > > > crate.
> > > > > > > > The plan has been answered here and it's quite
> straightforward. I
> > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > think we should spend time on writing it down but instead
> working on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > concrete migration work.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You may help in opendal's migration from mea 0.6.7 to
> asyncband 0.6.7
> > > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > they are logically identical.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/fast/asyncband/pull/149
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
> should
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Where do you find a pointer to https://docs.rs/mea? You may
> find it
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > "The
> > > > > > > > API documentation of Asyncband is hosted at
> > > > > https://docs.rs/asyncband"
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > the proposal now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I kept https://crates.io/crates/mea/reverse_dependencies
> because it
> > > > > > > shows
> > > > > > > > the current downstream status. The migration to asyncband
> has been
> > > > > under
> > > > > > > > processed. This should be the proper intermediate
> representation.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
> form is
> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Updated.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
> says "four
> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and
> Core
> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers
> tell one
> > > > > > > >> story.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Take Apache Answer you serve as a PMC member as an example.
> Answer
> > > > > has
> > > > > > > 111
> > > > > > > > contributors on the GitHub contributor graph [2] and now
> includes 18
> > > > > > > > committers and a PMC of 14 members. Why do you think these
> numbers
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > > be aligned? It is a common community status.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [2]
> https://github.com/apache/answer/graphs/contributors?all=1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you really want a concrete explanation: The other 5
> contributors
> > > > > make
> > > > > > > > 1~2 commits randomly. Andy has one commit from the Git
> history, but
> > > > > he
> > > > > > > > spent adequate time in design discussion and review. I count
> on him
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > several significant decisions.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > tison.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > mingcheng <[email protected]> 于2026年8月14日周五 22:11写道:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The project is well discussed and addressed the naming
> concern, so
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > >> in favour of accepting it. A few things worth fixing during
> or right
> > > > > > > >> after the vote which none of them were blocking:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Right now, we have four active contributors and the crate
> has been
> > > > > > > >> downloaded more than 5M times.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
> name", which
> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
> done. Given
> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
> pinning
> > > > > it,
> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
> publishing
> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
> else... and
> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
> should
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
> form is
> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
> says "four
> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and
> Core
> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers
> tell one
> > > > > > > >> story.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > > > >> mingcheng
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:16 PM Twice <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Following the discussion thread
> > > > > > > >> > (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/f31qd3jm3odomjwy3lqkk21coyqsr9xs),
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > >> > call for a formal vote to accept Asyncband into the Apache
> > > > > Incubator.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > As a reminder, the Asyncband proposal is here:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/INCUBATOR/pages/446071349/Asyncband+Proposal
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Please cast your vote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > [ ] +1, Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
> > > > > > > >> > [ ] 0, I don't care
> > > > > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator,
> > > > > because ...
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, and only
> votes
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > >> > the Incubator PMC members are binding. Votes from
> everyone are
> > > > > > > >> > welcome.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks!
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Best wishes,
> > > > > > > >> > Twice
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Xuanwo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://xuanwo.io/
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > - Hulk Lin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.