RE: user management - why bother?
"Noel J. Bergman" <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:58:24 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.incubator.projects |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Roland Weber wrote:
JEE container managed security does not cover instance based authorization,
and would not address which part(s) of a gallery a given entity can access.
> > permission checking should be left to the backend if
> > possible. I don't know what JCR offers for that at
> > the moment.
From the docs:
How do I manage the access rights of authenticated users?
The current JackrabbitSimpleAccessManager class only supports
three access levels: anonymous, normal, and system. Anonymous
users have read access while normal and system users have full
read-write access. You need to implement a custom AccessManager
class to get more fine-grained access control.
q.v.
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api-1/org/apache/jackrabbit/core/security/Acces
sManager.html
http://markmail.org/message/cc3lgit3fff5gcse
--- Noel