Re: updates to proposal (was: Codebases and Tidbits and Moving towards a proposed vote)
Roland Weber <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:12:23 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.incubator.projects |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Angie, >> But I'm still not happy with the sections on >> "Initial Goals"/"High Level Design" and "Relationships >> with Other Apache Products". This has to do with all >> the open design questions in the proposal. It is important >> to document such questions and the decisions, but that >> does not belong into the proposal. [...] > > I can go either way. As long as they are documented somewhere. I think > the reason that they ended up there is that we currently don't have > anywhere else to document them. We have this mailing list, which is archived: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-projects/ Once the podling gets started, we can put such stuff up on a wiki or web page. > >> 2. Define a roadmap for the "Inital Goals" section: [...] > > Not sure how to word that well. It could be the fever talking... I can have a stab at it tomorrow. I'm usually quite good with words, just wanted to discuss the contents first. >> The reason why I'm not jumping ahead with this is >> that I am not sure yet whether my understanding of >> the high level design is the current consensus. > > I think that your understanding is my understanding. It is what Luciano > has been coding toward, I think, and what Noel and I have discussed. I'm still unclear about the role of Sling in this. Is it just a "yeah, we *could* use that all right", or is it really the intention "our UI will be built on Sling"? In the latter case, there will be a web service API for accessing the repository, and a UI component that uses JCR directly (unless I am mistaken about Sling). That's not a problem, but something that people should be aware of. > Didn't mean to exclude you from the community! I changed it to include > architectural direction as well. Thanks :-) > I did make mention of the Roller discussions when I updated the proposal > but didn't include the links. That's fine. > Does anyone else have suggestions? Feel free to update the proposal! For a timeline, I suggest to finalize the proposal this week. Then we can call for a vote either this weekend or at the beginning of the next week. I am available to engage in discussions next week. Thoughts, anyone? cheers, Roland