Re: looking for a new name

Coming up with untaken names is insane these days.  I am starting to 
realize why the projects all get the names that they get.

I am liking PhotArk the more I consider it.

A Google search turns up three references, two of them just being 
archives of photos.  None of the references have anything to do with software.

Any dissenters?

Angie

At 01:36 AM 8/12/2008, Luciano Resende wrote:
>I can't really comment on the infringing/not infringing case for
>PicaGalley, but, as Noel said, I would also be OK if we continue with
>PicaGalley if there is somewhat consensus on it.
>
>As for new names, oh man, I have really thought, but couldn't really
>get something new, that catch the attention, and stick to your mind...
>and it's not take yet :)
>
>On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > PicaGalley or ...
> >
> >> MemoPics
> >> Imagery
> >> Image Barn
> >> Image Stable (searching for "image stable software" sucks)
> >> PhotoGarten  (photogarten.de is not about software)
> >
> > Photo Corral, but that's also taken.
> >
> > PhotoZon
> >
> > PhotArk -- I kinda like this one.  A bit of a play on archive / Ark.
> >
> > I also liked ArkLive, but someone may have that -- not sure.
> >
> > But I'm also satisfied to stick with PicaGalley, if that's what folks want.
> > I just don't believe that there is a collision with Picassa.
> >
> >        --- Noel
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
>
>
>--
>Luciano Resende
>Apache Tuscany Committer
>http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]