Re: Commit mailinglists
Scott Deboy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.logging |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+1 On Aug 17, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >> when I asked to publish the archives of the commits mailing lists it >> turned out that the various log4*-cvs lists don't really exist, mails >> actually go to the dev lists (with the exception of chainsaw which >> sends >> its commit mails here). > > ouch. Thanks for asking there > >> Before I ask infra to do the wrong thing, do you (do we) want to keep >> the commit mails on the dev lists or do we want to create real >> mailing >> lists for this? >> >> In the former case nothing needs to be done on the infrastructure >> side, >> only the config for chainsaw may need to be adapted. Otherwise we'd >> have a bunch of new mailing lists to be created. > > Good question. > > As there are not really tons of commits, is it more pragmatic to have > a single [email protected] > list for all products? We can split of as a project grows again. > > Drawback is of course that everybody gets all commit messages. Well > maybe, it is good actually and maybe there is a chance to fliter them > out. > > At the moment I prefer commits@ to keep oversight on all these small > projects > > Others? > > Cheers > >> >> Stefan >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de