Re: Log4J 2

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-02-06, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> As you may be aware I have been working on Log4j 2 for about 2 years
>> now.  It now consists of a fairly large body of code with fairly
>> decent documentation. I feel it is ready to come out of my
>> experimental branch and onto its own main branch where others will
>> hopefully feel more inclined to participate.
>
> For the benefit of the log4(X != j) communities, can you give some sort
> of elevator pitch for log4j 2.0?  What is different?  Given that the
> other projects around here have followed the 1.x model, it will be good
> to know what you considered good or bad of the "old" approach.
>
> Don't hesitate to send me to some sort of overview document, I admit I
> haven't looked for one, yet.

Great idea, could use that too. With the approaching ApacheCon EU I
think it would be a great talk there.

Cheers
Christian

> Thanks
>
>        Stefan



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de