Re: Mandatory svnpubsub migration by Jan 2013

Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.logging
Message-ID <CAPFNcki7qUz_1ndxqUgZSWpyqkZSqfrHD9EO42rAqtnv1DMqhg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Infra!

At the logging project most sub projects commit generated html to svn.
Going live is a matter of "svn up". Guess there is no problem to use
svnpubsub.

But there is one component (the upcoming log4j 2.0) which has started
with mvn site deploy. Is there a recommendation how combine this with
svnpubsub? The idea was to deploy to a local folder which is then
committed to svn. This would probably mean that a log4j2.0 website
update does mean a huge commit because most sources might be touched.
Is it a problem?

Cheers,
Christian


On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote:
> [PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST! DIRECT ALL FURTHER
> INQUIRIES TO [email protected]]
>
> FYI: infrastructure policy regarding website hosting has
> changed as of November 2011: we are requiring all websites
> and dist/ dirs to be svnpubsub or ASF CMS backed by the end of 2012.
> If your PMC has already met this requirement congratulations,
> you can ignore the remainder of this post.
>
> As stated on http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html#svnpubsub
> we are migrating our webserver infrastructure to 100% svnpubsub
> over the course of 2012.  If your site does not currently make
> use of this technology, it is time to consider a migration effort,
> as rsync-based sites will be PERMANENTLY FROZEN in Jan 2013 due
>
> to infra disabling the hourly rsync jobs.  While we recommend
> migrating to the ASF CMS [0] for Anakia based or Confluence based
> sites, and have provided tooling [1] to help facilitate this,
> we are only mandating svnpubsub (which the CMS uses itself).
>
> svnpubsub is a client-server system whereby a client watches an
> svn working copy for relevant commit notifications from the svn
> server.  It subsequently runs svn up on the working copy, bringing
> in the relevant changes.  sites that use static build technologies
> that commit the build results to svn are naturally compatible with
> svnpubsub; simply file a JIRA ticket with INFRA to request a
> migration: any commits to the resulting build tree will be
>
> instantly picked up on the live site.
>
>
> The CMS is a more elaborate system based on svnpubsub which
> provides a webgui for convenient online editing.  Dozens of
> sites have already successfully deployed using the CMS and
> are quite happy with the results.  The system is sufficiently
> flexible to accommodate a wide variety of choices regarding
> templating systems and storage formats, but most sites have
> standardized on the combination of Django and Markdown.  Talk
> to infra if you would like to use the CMS in this or some other
> fashion, we'll see what we can do.
>
>
> NOTE: the policy for dist/ dirs for managing project releases is
> similar.  We have setup a dedicated svn server for handling this,
> please contact infra when you are ready to start using it.
>
>
> HTH
>
>
> [0]: http://www.apache.org/dev/cms
> [1]: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/cms/conversion-utilities/
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.