Re: Logging web sites

I have given infra the requirements. We're waiting for them to set it up.

Regards,
Ivan

On 23 May 2012 17:57, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ivan,
>
> Were you able to get a test site to work yet?
>
> Ralph
>
> On May 22, 2012, at 5:52 AM, Ivan Habunek wrote:
>
> Yeah, sorry I haven't been more involved in the discussion. I've been to
> the phpday conference in Verona, and haven't had time to catch up.
>
> I posted a comment to the INFRA ticket with the required information. I'll
> keep in the loop from now on to answer any other questions.
>
> Regards,
> Ivan
>
>
> On 22 May 2012 13:40, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ivan,
>>
>> Daniel has updated the Jira and asked "Can you provide a list of
>> dependencies of your site's build process?  (as port names -- see
>> www.freshports.org -- for those deps that are in ports)"
>>
>> Since you have actually built the test site could you possibly help with
>> this? The issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4699.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On May 2, 2012, at 2:11 AM, Ivan Habunek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was away for a bit so I didn't comment earlier.
>>
>> My idea is to generate the site using Twig [1], a nice PHP templating
>> engine, in combination with Textile markup [2], which is much more
>> versatile than most other common markup languages (such as markdown, apt,
>> ...).
>>
>> I have already converted the logging web site. The code can be found here:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/branches/experimental-twig-textile/
>>
>> And I have deployed the generated web for demo here:
>> http://bezdomni.net/logging/
>>
>> This idea is obviously not compatible with the Apache CMS solution.
>> Frankly, I would prefer this solution to the CMS since, from what I have
>> seen, the CMS is quite a pain to use.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ivan
>>
>> [1] http://twig.sensiolabs.org/
>> [2] http://textile.sitemonks.com/
>>
>>
>> On 2 May 2012 10:44, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > What i thought was, why not to clean it up? Your proposed solutions
>>> > seem to be the cleanest way and updating everything just when we need
>>> > an update to the main site feels somehow wrong
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Joe has now proposed using the CMS for the main Logging web site along
>>> > with expaths.txt + svnpubsub for each sub-project. Each sub-project
>>> would
>>> > then use svn externals so they could be independently managed. This
>>> sounds
>>> > perfect to me.
>>>
>>> OK I understand svn externals is like "symlinks for svn". Sounds ok.
>>>
>>> I am a bit concerned on the CMS. Ivan has put much effort in the website
>>> design:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/branches/experimental-redesign/src/site/pages/
>>>
>>> I will ask infra (on the ticket) if it is possible to either use that
>>> design for the CMS or if we can bypass the CMS feature for this one
>>> too...
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> > Ralph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>>
>>
>>
>
>